Monday, June 04, 2018

Election results from 2018

Private Eye


The result in Beddington North was quite a surprise to many observers. Councillor Nick Mattey, formerly a Liberal Democrat, latterly a Green managed to get re-elected as an Independent with two other councillors. This news also managed to get into Private Eye magazine (above).




I chatted to Nick Mattey (his graphic above - poor spelling of my name) throughout the campaign. Our involvement in the Stop The Incinerator campaign has resulted in a friendship.

Independents getting elected in London is an amazing phenomenon. However, the election of these three in Beddington North was not a complete surprise:

1) Nick Mattey has been an active councillor in Beddington North. People know him. He has fully canvassed the households in the ward. If he wasn't a sitting councillor it would have been almost impossible to achieve success.

2) The Lib Dems in Sutton are serial leafleters around election time. Nick managed to orchastrate a campaign which exceeded the Lib Dems in terms of sheer volume and cost. I know he spoke to the Electoral Commission to work out how he could spend his way to success.

3) Voters are cynical about politicians more than ever before. Voters are learning that voting for a political party doesn't mean 'X'. It could mean 'Y'. For example, if you are a BREXIT voter, which political party represents your voice? The people of Beddington North have experienced deceit on an unprecedented scale. It was logical to turn to three residents who, total combined, have lived in the ward for many decades.

The 1.96 per cent votes I polled was to be expected given Green votes were probably going to the three Independents. This coupled with the fact that I don't actually live in the borough and both Labour and the Conservatives threw everything at the ward to win these three vulnerable Lib Dem seats suggests the result was fair.  On average Green candidates polled between 2 and 3 per cent in Sutton.

Election count at Westcroft Leisure Centre

I took the above picture at the Count. Nick Mattey is in the foreground. You can see the other tables have finished counting but because of the Independents - bundled in with the split votes - the counting continued long after other wards had declared.

Meanwhile,

CHIPSTEAD, HOOLEY AND WOODMANSTERNE

TIM ARCHER - CONSERVATIVE - 1357
PETER PARROTT - LABOUR - 276
CHRIS HOWELL - LIB DEM - 196
SHASHA KHAN - GREEN - 183
JAMES CLACK - UKIP - 122



The result in Chipstead, Hooley and Woodmansterne was completely expected. The Tory won by landslide. Interestingly less than 100 votes separated the other candidates.

Scoring a similar margin of victory to the Conservative was the irrepressible Jonathan Essex in Redhill East ward. He is one of the legends in the UK Green party. More good news was the election of Hal Brown in Earlswood and Whitebushes. Full details here.

--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Monday, April 30, 2018

Beddington North AND Chipstead Hooley and Woodmansterne


Full list of candidates for Beddington North




I've been leafleting with colleagues in Beddington North ward in London borough of Sutton. As usual the Lib Dems are manically leafleting the ward to hold onto their three councillors. The result this time is uncertain. My logic is that if people are concerned with the incinerator, which is located in the ward, they shouldn't look further than someone who has fought 10 years to to stop it. The above newspaper article is from 2009 and I am using it at a basis for the final leaflet. Labour and the Tories also think they will win this ward. Basically, everyone standing genuinely thinks they can win and this will lower the threshold to finish in the top three.

Anti-incinerator campaigner Nick Mattey is standing as an independent with two others and he is throwing everything into the campaign. Nick is bit like Marmite, not everyone's favourite yeast base spread.

I bumped into him when leafleting and it was good that we still have good respect for each other even though we in a battle to win the seat.

Me and Nick Mattey

I am also standing in Reigate and Banstead council elections in my home ward.

Tags ,

Saturday, January 06, 2018

Incinerator burns



Photo credit: Peter Alfrey

I can't begin to explain how sad this image makes me feel.

--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Sunday, December 10, 2017

GLA Environmental Committee hearing

--------------------------------------------------

Front sheet: here

Last Thursday I went along to City Hall to hear Shlomo Dowen of UKWIN (United Kingdon Without Incineration Network). I didn't enjoy the experience. Shlomo was brilliant but he was only one voice among six. Julian Walker and Dan Cooke - our paths have crossed a couple of times already - spoke with great authority. That is their skill. Professor Daryl Newport was the only partial ally Shlomo had..

It was mentioned the Beddington incinerator and a revamped Edmonton incinerator are the residual waste solutions for London for the next 25 years.

Those on the committee, asked questions and listened to responses. Caroline Russell of the Greens and Nicky Gavron (Labour) queried the logic that ruled the room but to what end? Nothing is going to change at GLA level. 

AT THE END OF THE DAY IT COMES DOWN TO THIS: WHO DO YOU CHOOSE TO BELIEVE?

Picture of me at the meeting below.

https://twitter.com/GreenKnight2010/status/938789292826136577

Tags ,

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Malcolm Wicks on Robert Mugabe

Today, President of Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe resigned. Here is his letter of resignation.

In early 2003, I arranged to see my then MP, the late Malcolm Wicks - MP for Croydon North. At the time I was stunned to see the UK join the US in invading Iraq. Sitting on a huge majority and as minister, Wicks did what was expected of him and supported the war in Iraq. It incensed me enough to focus my #GE2005 campaign on his unequivocal support of the invasion.

           From left to right: Bernice Golberg, Malcolm Wicks, Tony Blair & me. April 05

In our meeting in his Friday surgery back in 2003, Malcolm Wicks assured me that we would find WMD. He pointed out Saddam Hussain was a tyrant and a dictator and that he had to be removed. I said if that was the UK's policy then why didn't we get rid of all the despots in the world, e.g. Robert Mugabe. Mr Wicks replied, "Things are changing in Zimbabwe, he'll be gone by the end of the year." As it turned out, just like his WMD prediction, Wicks was way off the mark - nearly 15 years off the mark.
--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Friday, November 17, 2017

Niall Bolger resorts to fake news to protect Tom Brake at #GE2017 count

Incinerator and politics again

After speaking to the Electoral Commission, I can confirm they have advised me that there is no course of action I can take BUT they have made a note of what happened in Sutton on the night of the count.

In short:
London Borough of Sutton Council, CEO, Niall Bolger protected Lib Dem Tom Brake from embarrassment at the General Election Count in 2017. He did this by choosing not to allow candidates on stage for the declaration. 

Why did he do this? 
Because he was concerned there was going to be a demonstration on live TV and I will assert this was a contributing factor:



Why is this important? 
There is a democratic tradition to allow Mr Fishfinger or Lord Buckethead to heap ridicule on any politician. However, Niall Bolger, Sutton CEO, and thus the Returning Officer for the election, is allowed to run the Declaration as he pleases. Knowing he is knee deep in involvement with the incinerator, along with Tom Brake and Cllr Ruth Dombey, he chose not uphold the democratic tradition of this country, and to avoid any embarrassment on national TV.  Furthermore, however outrageous a notion, is it possible that Niall Bolger would magically make some opposition ballot papers disappear to ensure victory for his Lib Dem allies? One very senior candidate complained that Tom Brake knew the result of this marginal seat (Carshalton and Wallington) before any other candidates. 


Mr Fishfinger who stood against Lib Dem Leader Tim Farron in  Westmoreland and Lonsdale


I spoke to the Electoral Commission after receiving a reply from Local Government Ombudsman. The Electoral Commission advised me that there are a number of powers which are handed to the Returning Officer, including the Declaration, when organising elections. For example, if he wanted to introduce the winner on stage with a drum roll and indoor fireworks he is entitled to do so. Presumably, he can let a favoured candidate know the result before others.

Some background:

The local Governement Ombudsman (LGO) was called in after I had reached deadlock with the council (see further down). LGO's reply:

I have considered what Mr Y said in his complaint.

What I found Mr Y was a candidate in the last general election and complains the Council decided not to allow candidates on stage when the declaration of the result was announced.

Mr Y feels he should have been allowed to stand on stage and feels he was denied this right.

The Returning Officer is responsible for organising elections. In this role, the Returning Officer works independently and not on behalf of the Council. The Ombudsman has no legal jurisdiction therefore to investigate complaints about the organisation of elections. This includes how the result was announced.

Final decision: We have no legal remit to investigate the organisation of elections and so cannot investigate Mr Y’s complaint.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

I initially made the complaint to the Sutton Council after Niall Bolger used fake news when commenting to the Sutton Guardian. He told the Sutton Guardian that,


"In recent times, candidates have not stood on the stage at Sutton when the counts have been announced".

WRONG!!! At the previous General Election, candidates were allowed, and he allowed it.

2015 General Election Declaration


When I complained to the council, I was assured by the Head of Electoral Services that the decision was not political and an entirely different explanation was proffered:

Sutton were not alone in not asking candidates to stand on the stage - Merton and Croydon did the same. House keeping that seems relevant - I am not sure whether you attended the 2015 count in Sutton, you would have noted that we managed to add two extra teams meaning that the stage was smaller - the main reason for this is that we ran the count as mini counts in wards and we have 18 wards - this meant that we finished almost 2 hours earlier this year.  With this in mind I for future need to re-arrange my count floor so the stage remains a decent size and there is room to move at the front of the hall - you will have noted how cramped it was which is why we removed tables at the end.  The decision taken not to invite candidates was not political or for the reasons the article and tweets implied.
Just to add, on the night of the Count, the Declaration for Sutton and Cheam constituency was called about an hour before Carshalton and Wallington. I noticed immediately that only the victor was called up on stage. I immediately went to the Head of Electoral Services and asked if all the candidates would be allowed on stage for the Declaration for Carshalton & Wallington. I was pointed in the direction of Niall Bolger. The Head of Electoral Services did not offer the explanation of the 'smaller stage' as per the reply to my complaint, and instead indicated that the CEO could allow it. I walked up to Niall Bolger, and in the rudest manner imaginable he said:

"NO! I have made my decision," and then walked off.


-------------------------------------------------- Tags ,

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Less than one per cent voted sensibly!

Sensible?


Which is the most sensible way to vote? 

Just days before the General Election, if you were commuting along the Purley Way, on the border of Sutton, you would have seen a spectacular piece of graffiti on a billboard just opposite Waddon Retail Park. It read: VOTE SENSIBLY FOR BRITAIN. It was such a piece of unblemished art, I almost believe someone paid for the billboard space.

I stood in Carshalton and Wallington - a Lib Dem/Tory marginal seat. In this constituency voting sensibly is very much subjective:

  • Vote LIB DEM to keep the Conservative Matthew Maxwell-Scott out! Sensible score 5/5
  • Vote LIB DEM to keep Theresa May out because she is awful! Sensible score 5/5
  • Vote TORY to stop Lib Dem Tom Brake - a cheerleader for Sutton council! Sensible score 5/5
  • Vote TORY if you are a UKIP voter - that's who UKIP Sutton endorse! Sensible score 5/5
  • Vote LABOUR if Jeremy Corbyn excites you and ignore two horse race! Sensible score 5/5
  • Vote INDEPENDENT whistleblowing anti-incinerator Cllr Nick Mattey! Sensible score 5/5
  • Vote GREEN for the guy who risked his house to stoptheincinerator.co.uk Sensible score 5/5


Above are all sensible ways to vote in Carshalton and Wallington. Some are tactical. Some are not. I came across a number of voters when knocking on doors, leaning towards one of the options above.

However, many of these very same voters were contemplating whether there might be a more sensible option. At times I felt like a counsellor as I listened to them pore over what was running through their mind.

I came across Green voters (and even the odd Green Party member) who were thinking of voting LIB DEM to keep the Tory out. Green Party talk of progressive alliances and standing down in constituencies had changed the thought processes of those who would normally put 'X' by Green party. Zoe Williams has gone as far as saying Greens "effectively committed electoral hari-kiri for the sake of opposing the Conservatives."

Big thanks to Maeve Tomlinson - my agent.

At 3:29am on 9th June the Returning officer, Niall Bolger, read out the result privately to agents and candidates just before the official declaration. Maeve scribbled the numbers below. Niall wasn't pausing for anyone.

Result
Result on BBC web site

Conclusion:

Green vote was squeezed by all of the above valid sensible scenarios.

Footnote:



The declaration was a nonsense. I contacted Sutton Guardian about this. Those who were watching the coverage on TV (still from BBC London News above) might have thought all the candidates had gone to the pub to discuss if people had indeed voted sensibly.

--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Interview on St Helier Radio

--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Standing up for what matters